The law of attraction is one such behavior that can encompass love and affection towards others. How far do you support this statement?
Recently, the law of attraction has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the Pros and Cons of love and affection towards others?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the psychological standpoint, patterns of behavior are bound up inextricably with normal norms, which indicates they lead to both acceptable social behavior and standards of behavior. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between blinded obedience and love as well as an exponential increase in antisocial issue. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of public attention is correlated positively with not only positive feeling but also good manner.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, community laws attribute to modern lifestyle, in that it would come down to more stress, anxiety, and depression. A salient example of such attribution is lovely couples, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take martial problem for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint endless love problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to public ideology, social norms, and even cultural notions. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of inherited traits, human values, and sufficient love.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the correct attraction ways must be taken into consideration. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-01 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
- Does a certain type of music affect young children's learning? Agree/disagree 85
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What forms do they take? Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones? 85
- building more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? agree or disagree? 11
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the law of attraction has spar...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the psychological standpoint, patte...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive feeling but also good manner. Within the realm of society, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...human values, and sufficient love. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 33, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70890410959 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06907979654 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695205479452 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2700564394 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.230769231 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145251578881 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389045613807 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368524880816 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773295204483 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426179879704 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.