Some developing countries invite large multinational companies to open offices and factories in order to help their economy. However, others feel that foreign companies should be shut out and instead the government should help the local companies to contribute to the economic growth. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, multinational companies regarding the economic growth has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "does government invite large multinational companies to open offices in country?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economic downturn standpoint, developing countries are bound up inextricably with substantial revenue, which indicates they lead to both economic issue and manufacturing. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between international collaboration and private investment as well as an exponential increase in financial support. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of important management is correlated positively with not only leadership director but also decision making.
Within the realm of technology, without the slightest doubt, high technologies attribute to different country, in that it would come down to less cost, more efficient, and high employment. A salient example of such attribution is daily products, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take local companies for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint foreign contribution problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to business partner, foreign currency, and even loan bank. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of government to trigger local manufactures.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that government must be accountable to involve local companies into business market. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-25 | mojtaba1980 | 77 | view |
- Culture shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the possible options to eradicate this issue? 77
- building more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? agree or disagree? 11
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Some people think it is not necessary for adults to receive education in class. Self-study is a good way for them to study more effectively. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- People are moving to urban areas from rural areas for better life. What do you think about? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the economic downturn standpoint, d...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...director but also decision making. Within the realm of technology, without ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent to trigger local manufactures. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00341296928 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28655296907 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 139.433497537 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.699658703072 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1704988064 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.307692308 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176390383131 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049104354999 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650305903612 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101184617828 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633004760079 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.82 11.5310837438 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.