Some developing countries invite large multinational companies to open offices and factories in order to help their economy. However, others feel that foreign companies should be shut out and instead the government should help the local companies to contr

Recently, the phenomenon of opening the large multinational offices and factories in developing countries and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that foreign companies cannot be highly beneficial for economic growth, such an issue is regarded as thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that inviting large international companies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to agree with attracting large multinational companies to open their offices. At first, it is important for governments to help local companies to participate in economic growth. However, the investments of foreign companies are very beneficial for developing countries. For example, international companies could recruit workers and decrease unemployment rates.
In addition, helping local companies improves their financial situation and more income for skilled workers. But, local companies also can collaborate with multinational companies to enhance their experiences and develop their technologies. For instance, a recent scientific research undertaken by a reputable university has shown that a significant number of host countries profited their local companies with advanced technologies of international companies.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the benefit of large multinational companies' investments far outweighed its drawbacks. Not only for the economy, but also for higher rates of employment.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of opening the ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rkers and decrease unemployment rates. In addition, helping local companies imp...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chnologies of international companies. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02145922747 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30495512242 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613733905579 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8066127458 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.916666667 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.25397266985 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383883395602 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146997115844 0.0925447433944 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062047429347 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229660787558 0.151781067708 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777629959829 0.0609392437508 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 11.5310837438 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.