In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons.
Recently, the phenomenon of student assessment by written examination and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that written exams might be highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a variety of assessment methods can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, education system can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the facts that school curriculum as well as employment prospects, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that examination evaluates the quality of learning. thus beneficial ramifications of both ultimate skills and productive life apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of education, aimless exams might increase the consequences of ineffective learning. Moreover, fundamental aspects of such evaluation relate to this reality that the demerits of written tests pertain to limited knowledge. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of examination as the only way to assess students is correlated negatively with academic performance. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of failure in self-achievement.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of assessment based on written exam far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of such concept prove the significance of project-based assessments, but pinpoint education quality implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | njerime | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | kooshandehfar | 22 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | kooshandehfar | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | armimogh | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | armimogh | 85 | view |
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 77
- Essay topics: Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 85
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 77
- "More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree with statement? 85
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...tion evaluates the quality of learning. thus beneficial ramifications of both ultima...
^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...tion evaluates the quality of learning. thus beneficial ramifications of both ultima...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78625954198 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36934493432 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641221374046 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8591754961 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114922031134 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381057386529 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340775157765 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0673273459593 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235210956739 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.