In a cashless society, people use more credit cards instead of cash. Cashless society seems to be a reality, and how realistic do you think it might be? What are the benefits and problems of this phenomenon?
Recently, the phenomenon of the cashless society and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of using more credit cards instead of cash is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe to investigate that being in reality society can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, cashless society requirements can provide society with noticeable effects that are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantage of credit card improvements, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of the real phenomenon. Thus, beneficial ramifications of the benefits of using credit cards are visible.
From a scientific point of view, the cashless society issues can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to the reality that demerits of people are using credit cards are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by prestigious universities described the role of cashless society strategies. Hence, the predicted outcome of the problem-solving method by using credit cards is noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using credits cards instead of cash far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of using credit cards prove the significance of cashless society sciences, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-09 | MojtabaKarami | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | MojtabaKarami | 85 | view |
| 2020-07-27 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-07-14 | Gohar Khan | 83 | view |
- In a cashless society people use more credit cards instead of cash Cashless society seems to be a reality and how realistic do you think it might be What are the benefits and problems of this phenomenon 80
- In a cashless society people use more credit cards instead of cash Cashless society seems to be a reality and how realistic do you think it might be What are the benefits and problems of this phenomenon 85
- Nowadays people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life 79
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.532 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13846076923 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8420552312 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.727272727 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441090190931 0.242375264174 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152828643945 0.0925447433944 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546696375744 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259110304366 0.151781067708 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378670588935 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.532 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13846076923 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8420552312 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.727272727 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441090190931 0.242375264174 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152828643945 0.0925447433944 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546696375744 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259110304366 0.151781067708 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378670588935 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.