In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. Cashless society seems to be a reality, and how realistic do you think it might be? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
Recently, the phenomenon of "in a cashless society, people use more credit cards and cashless society seems to be a reality" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that using cash might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that using more credit cards can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the medical standpoint, in a cashless society, using more credit cards rather than cash can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that preventing the pathogens' expansion and not spreading diseases are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the various types of microbes on banknotes. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both being healthy and using less cash distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, using more credit cards by people in a cashless society might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the lack of the Internet bandwidth. Moreover, fundamental aspects of developing a cashless society can relate to the reality that the demerits of fundamental infrastructures can pertain to the lack of the government's budget. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of expanding fiber cables across the country were correlated positively with implementing the electronic commerce, the local authorities would ultimately address environmental issues. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of cashless payments.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the idea that the merits of the cashless society far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-27 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-07-14 | Gohar Khan | 83 | view |
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake Regardless of whether the course 84
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 84
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pathogens'' or 'pathogen's'?
Suggestion: pathogens'; pathogen's
... stem from the fact that preventing the pathogens expansion and not spreading diseases ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17550345965 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603333333333 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.687040612 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.545454545 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40422030158 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14126319277 0.0925447433944 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108360736677 0.071462118173 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224654653528 0.151781067708 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111284023947 0.0609392437508 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.