Nowadays more and more people engage in dangerous activities such as sky diving and motorcycling Are you in favour of them Use examples to support your opinion

Essay topics:

Nowadays, more and more people engage in dangerous activities, such as sky diving and motorcycling. Are you in favour of them? Use examples to support your opinion.

Recently, the phenomenon of "nowadays, more and more people engage in dangerous activities" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that dangerous activities such as motorcycling might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that dangerous activities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From the psychology standpoint, engaging in dangerous activities such as sky diving and motorcycling can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that promoting excitement and sky diving are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of excitement activities on people's emotions. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both enjoying the life and participating in motorcycling distinctly can be observed.

Within the realm of medical science, without the slightest doubt, dangerous activities such as sky diving might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of injuries. Moreover, fundamental aspects of traumas can relate to the reality that the demerits of high-pressure activities can pertain to improper physical activities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of dangerous activities were correlated positively with people's excitement, the local authorities would ultimately address preventing the injuries of such activities. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of guiding the young people to healthier activities.

To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of engaging in dangerous activities far outweigh its downsides.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-07-13 Nawal Fatima 77 view
2020-09-15 sattar_iust 88 view
2020-06-29 Kamranaslam213 72 view
2020-06-24 Gohar Khan 77 view
2020-05-12 karbasis59@gmail.com 85 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user sattar_iust :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: SKY_DIVING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'skydiving'?
Suggestion: skydiving
...ngaging in dangerous activities such as sky diving and motorcycling can provide the societ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: SKY_DIVING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'skydiving'?
Suggestion: skydiving
... the fact that promoting excitement and sky diving are inextricably bound up. Regarding my...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: SKY_DIVING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'skydiving'?
Suggestion: skydiving
...est doubt, dangerous activities such as sky diving might exacerbate the already catastroph...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01063829787 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41290457086 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599290780142 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.496493177 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.090909091 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311521163551 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105053424254 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676375886462 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175589060178 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534559596069 0.0609392437508 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 12.6369458128 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 11.5310837438 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.5123152709 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.