Cinemas, music, sports idols are role models for youngsters. Do you agree or disagree?
The topic of role models for youngsters has become a heated debate among societies. Although many people assert that it is beneficial for students to make artists, players and sportsmen their idol, the others refute this proposal by saying that juveniles should follow scholars and doctors. This essay will discuss why young people should follow their role models in the fashion industry and reach a logical conclusion.
There are many factors explain why students prefer cinemas, music and sports idols in which the most preponderant one is that they give hope to students. Furthermore, pupils come to know about the fashion industry, and they keep their selves up to date. For instance, a study revealed that students who involved in media and sports always take better marks than their counter peers. Hence, sports and fashion industry play a strong role in childhood growth.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument would be that those role models enhance their interpersonal skills and nourish their minds. Moreover, young people follow their idols and develop good social links to excel in future life. For example, a survey revealed that 80% of the students succeeded in their careers just because they have an excellent taste of music. Apparently, songs play a pivotal role in constructing child future.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the role of music and sports models for students in terms of building confidence and making future life better. Therefore, in my opinion, such following should appreciated because it is fruitful for students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- Space travel is fantastic these days but there are many issues such as environmental problems that we should be focusing on What are your views on the allocation of public funding 91
- Employees should be treated with respect to their age, please elaborate this. 77
- Should goverment build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport. 77
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Gove your response with justification. 88
- Advantages and disadvantages of emigration 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.268 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.458373446 2.71678728327 90% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7120572555 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.307692308 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238863146776 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088572894058 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056064726351 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156112286343 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275562685376 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.