cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of better network for public transport in cities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the transport system is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that transportation cost can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, a transport network can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of private transport, as well as the rail transport, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered road transport. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the public safety and the transport industry apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the road facilities might increase the consequences of traffic congestion. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the faulty testing system could relate to this reality that the demerits of transport infrastructure pertain to a road accident. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of transport strategies is correlated negatively with the physical hazardous. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of transport legislation.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the road network far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a road construction project prove the significance of road improvements, but also pinpoint transportation development implications.
- Does a certain type of music effect on a human? Agree / Disagree. 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- Whether design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? give your opinion. 77
- Some universities deduct marks from students’ works if given in late, what are the problems and what is your opinion? 88
- Should digital media replace textbooks? what are the reviews and possible solutions. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6954887218 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37420832397 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627819548872 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7399442262 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181622662166 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653589148519 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479645141301 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107727975222 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228997987005 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.