As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
In metropolitan cities, public transport is the key factor for mass transit. Either government should ease the public by improving the public transport or private vehicle owners by expanding the road system has sparked a new debate. This essay will discuss that why improvement in transportation system is necessary and why building the new roads cannot solve the problem.
The mass transportation should also be the part of master plan when cities expansion come under consideration. Mass transit like metro trains and public bus services has be engorged over the private cars in order to reduce the traffic. For example, Dubai has the foremost metro train and bus services system in the world, that not only provide commuter the real-time metro and bus timings at each stop but also serves with the internet Wi-Fi access to encourage public transport. Therefore, public transport can be the answer for the expanding cities.
Contrary to this, we also have to embrace the existence of private vehicles. Expanding the roads can ease the traffic but cars or lorries emission is also one of the causes for global warming, and its use can be controlled. For instance, to discourage the use of cars, government can increase the car registration fee and can put toll tax on busy streets, so people start preferring the public transport over the private vehicle. Hence, the problem of transportation can be controlled.
While the cities are expanding the government should focus on public transport instead of road expansions. This essay discussed the issues with private vehicles and provided the solution to encourage commuters on public transport. In my opinion enhancements in public transport can help to reduce the global warming.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 88 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 55 | view |
- Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and less people use cash. How realistic do you think it is and do you think it is beneficial or problematic? 65
- The advanced medical technology will expand human’s life. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse? 75
- What are the positive and negative aspects of the connection to outside world including mobile phone email and social networking 68
- Artificially intelligent robots are increasing taking human jobs. Some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots while others believe that there will be a limit to the tasks that robots can perform.Choose which position you most agree 64
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss the both sides. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...etro trains and public bus services has be engorged over the private cars in order...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of transportation can be controlled. While the cities are expanding the government...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22142857143 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75666169006 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532142857143 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1143176555 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.428571429 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195234219974 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824326857349 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049268458499 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137182805488 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393761640226 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.