Climate change is huge concern in today’s world. Discuss about the roles that Government, corporates and individuals can play to improve it.
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that roles of humans in controlling the global warming is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that mankind role in global warming can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From environmental standpoint, global warming can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that increasing global temperature, as well as human life, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered effect of abnormal temperature on mice population. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both global warming and mankind role apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of human life, global warming might increase the consequences of life disorders. Moreover, fundamental aspects of global warming relate to this reality that the demerits of increasing temperature pertain to earth. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of air pollution is correlated negatively with environmental phenomenon. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of governmental forces.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of interfering human in controlling global warming far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of ozone layer depletion prove the significance of long term planning, but also pinpoint individuals responsibility implications
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-12-02 | MJ Hessami | 85 | view |
2018-03-21 | Sivasravankumar | 80 | view |
2018-03-15 | nipung143 | 80 | view |
2017-12-02 | Amir NIkzad | 88 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... analyse that throughout this essay. From environmental standpoint, global wa...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mankind role apparently can be seen. Within the realm of human life, global w...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eived notion of governmental forces. To conclude, while there are several com...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 308, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...f long term planning, but also pinpoint individuals responsibility implications
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80916030534 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30092435929 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637404580153 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5966616712 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.833333333 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0901663963585 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365227175014 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381381143648 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.055739965201 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367392266207 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.