Companies use advertisement to influence people to buy things sometimes which they don't need. Give your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of using advertisements by companies and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of introducing the production is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that funny advertisements can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, influencing people can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of marketing developments, as well as marketing facilities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I perform an academic experiment which discovered the correlation between people and advertisements. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both showing advertisements on television and watching tv apparently can be seen.
Within a realm of science, buying unnecessary things might increase the consequences of companies’ strategies. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of useful staff could relate to this reality that demerits of shopping online pertain to online influencers. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of advertisements methods correlated negatively with companies’ facilities. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of sales strategies.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of encouraging marketing far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantages of increasing productions prove the significance of sales benefits, but also pinpoint comprehensive marketing implications.
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Company Top Level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions Discuss 85
- The university will deduct the students scores for late assignments Opinion and solutions 80
- Companies use advertisement to influence people to buy things sometimes which they don t need Give your opinion 88
- In town and cities the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop Do you agree or disagree 85
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55131222204 2.71678728327 131% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669260700389 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8312582487 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15954715092 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493533330033 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468539043505 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788396978579 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470995111774 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.52 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55131222204 2.71678728327 131% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669260700389 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8312582487 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15954715092 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493533330033 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468539043505 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788396978579 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470995111774 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.52 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.