In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the small mall and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the mater of small shopping is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that local marketing can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the large shopping mall can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of shopping strategies, as well as marketing methods, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered building shopping centers. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both strip malls and crowded shopping malls apparently can be seen.
Within a realm of science, Replacing the small local shops might increase the consequences of damaging small markets. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of changing small marketing to malls could relate to this reality that the demerits of huge malls pertain to destroying local shopping. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downside of local stores could relate negatively with residential malls. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of local shopping requirements.
To conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefit of decreasing numbers of large malls far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantages of business booms prove the significance of creating new jobs, but also pinpoint economical booms implications.
- Even though global warming was not a real issue for past generation people have realised that it is an obstacle now Temperature rising has become a global matter and a threat for all planet I will discuss about this problem s causes and provide its remedi 56
- Students with degree earn high salary than who doesn t have Some say that they have to pay the full cost of their courses Give opinion 80
- Company Top Level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions Discuss 85
- The university will deduct the students scores for late assignments Opinion and solutions 80
- What s global problems and how the government should solve them 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58270676692 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09141672522 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0354690752 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319528845575 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106661631401 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651982889275 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166545904534 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697588329921 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.