Company’s top level authorities should get their employees in decision making process. Discuss
Top level managers are always in need of delegation to make day-to-day decisions. Deploying employees in decision-making can be risky at times. Many higher level authorities feel that employees should be used to do what they are initially hired to do. On the contrary, others want to push them to responsible positions of decision-making. Both sides will be critiqued before the reasoned conclusion is found.
Today many hold the idea that employee’s involvement in the decision-making process may damage the company. For example, various factors need to be considered before making any decision. A unhedged risk may lead to real losses. This shows that only a mature managers should take part in decision-making of the firm.
Conversely, involving employees in decision-making may bring out the inside hidden talent for the benefit of the company. Say, for instance, often it is the employees who deal with chests directly and know exactly what initiatives will best serve the organization. Thus, it goes without saying that authorities must back employees and push them in a role of decision-making.
All in all, after diligently analyzing these two points of views, it is believed that employee participation in decision-making with the support of management is be beneficial to the company. It’s is felt that advantages of employees involved in decision-making outweigh the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-18 | minhaz | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | Trish_25 | 72 | view |
| 2019-03-06 | Samuelparera | 77 | view |
| 2018-11-15 | RAVI.SHANKAR | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-30 | SB83 | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 7, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...he reasoned conclusion is found. Today many hold the idea that employee's involveme...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
... considered before making any decision. A unhedged risk may lead to real losses. ...
^
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'manager'?
Suggestion: manager
...l losses. This shows that only a mature managers should take part in decision-making of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...aking with the support of management is be beneficial to the company. It's is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 218.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4495412844 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.431621913 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619266055046 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8986669072 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8571428571 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5714285714 20.9669160288 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330335844411 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11132601425 0.0925447433944 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743228563133 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199096165756 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308209655987 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.