Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
The importance of face to face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters, email, or telephone calls which was always debatable has now become more other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favouring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that technology is most important thinking in human life, and many people use internet, email, and telephone calls. This technology is mostly time saving product. For example, nowadays mostly indian people use to smart phones ans easily pick calls not high cost. Needless to say all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint there are some merits but one the crucial effect is that telephone calls and many other kind of emails . Hence, it apparent why many are in favour of this trend.
To conclusion. according to the argument aforementioned above one can reach top a conclusion that the benefits of types of communication such as emails are indeed too dire to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | manraj123 | 87 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | manraj123 | 87 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | nevermind123 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | nevermind123 | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... example, nowadays mostly indian people use to smart phones ans easily pick calls n...
^^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'phones'' or 'phone's'?
Suggestion: phones'; phone's
...adays mostly indian people use to smart phones ans easily pick calls not high cost. Ne...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hone calls and many other kind of emails . Hence, it apparent why many are in favo...
^^
Line 13, column 16, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...vour of this trend. To conclusion. according to the argument aforementioned above on...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of types of communication such as emails are indeed too dire to ignore.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, thus, for example, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14090909091 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69403724058 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604545454545 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7573998346 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.818181818 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182984017517 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535932284943 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955423095822 0.071462118173 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101065953908 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459668326638 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 87.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 79.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.