Do you that with online information library books are useless?
Recently, the phenomenon of using online websites making library books useless and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of online websites is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that online searching can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, online internet search making library books useless can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of electronic books, as well as online book reading, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered web based searches. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both search engines and virtual libraries apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, online information causing library books being useless might increase the consequences of traditional book reading. Moreover, fundamental aspects of hard copy can relate to this reality that demerits of paper books pertain to wasting money. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of paying money is correlated negatively with wasting resources. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of information technology.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of online libraries making library books useless far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of PDF books prove the significance of saving time, but also pinpoint information technology implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-10 | sadegh shahsavand | 85 | view |
| 2018-08-07 | sadegh shahsavand | 85 | view |
- Do you that with online information library books are useless? 85
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities Do you agree or disagree 69
- do you agree that the government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting? 77
- do you agree that universities should provide so much theoretical knowledge or give more practical training throughout their courses? 80
- do you agree that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69144981413 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06349477024 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64312267658 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0949615318 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.583333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418411382671 0.242375264174 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131663670994 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110056074151 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244340341126 0.151781067708 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052780436339 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.