Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is responsibility of producers to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experiences.

Essay topics:

Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is responsibility of producers to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experiences.

These days, there is a controversial debate between people about over packaged products. While it is possible to claim that packing of product plays an important role in marketing and hygiene of a product, my view is that extra packaging brings unnecessary consequences for our society. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analysing why consumers and producers should avoid over packing products.

First of all, there are several reasons why extra packaged products should be avoid by consumers. One of them is that the products are overpriced because of the investment on extra packing machineries. For example, the price of a candy is 20 cents in the past and it increases to 1 dollar due to the growth in packaging cost. People are also spending extra money for an over packaging product which can create a compound effect on financial control of the society.

Secondly, producers should also avoid extra packaging of products. It can be claimed that the producers are wasting the global resources on extra packaging to attract consumer’s attention on the products. For instance, Loli, a food production company in Myanmar, produced instant coffee with attractive packaging standard and National Environment Agency of Myanmar blamed that Loli used 2% of country’s resources on its packaging. Thus, producers are also responsible to reduce extra packaging.

While there are strong arguments on both sides of the cases, my view is that consumers have the major responsibility on the problems of over packaging products since they are the major target of product manufacturers. I would strongly suggest that governments should enforce to increase the tax of over packaging manufacturers.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-01-30 Snoob 77 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Snoob :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'avoided'?
Suggestion: avoided
...s why extra packaged products should be avoid by consumers. One of them is that the p...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e tax of over packaging manufacturers.  
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29090909091 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96715686048 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534545454545 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8542563858 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.923076923 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392756489394 0.242375264174 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15126943707 0.0925447433944 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652084504432 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246236844227 0.151781067708 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122952015084 0.0609392437508 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.