Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?
Today, over packaged products are flooding the markets. Since over packaging cost the consumers as well as the environment, there is an urgent need to curtail its usage. It is a producer’s responsibility to shun such packaging techniques. Producers should work towards both cost savings and reduce environmental damage.
Over-packaging often shoots up product’s price significantly. Therefore, less packaging will automatically pull the rate downwards. For example, McDonald packs their burgers in a paper wrap then put it in a cardboard container and then hand it to customers in a paper bag. Instead, if they only put it in a box, it will reduce the price of the burger. When looking at this example, it is evident that responsible steps by producers to cut down on excess packaging expense is not only plausible but also mutually beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | maniram vicky | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | raavi sandhu | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Ekta shah | 77 | view |
- Some people believe famous people's support towards international aid organizations draws attention to problems.Others think celebrities make the problems less important.Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- You have recently bought a piece of electronics which does not work well. Write a letter to the manager of the shop and describe the problem.In your letter, include what you have done about it and suggest what action you would like them to take. 89
- Even though globalization affects the world’s economies in a positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. Discuss. 89
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 22
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in business, hospital, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used for in the future? Is this dependence on computer a good things or should we be more suspicious 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, therefore, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 31.9359605911 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 721.0 1207.87684729 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 137.0 242.827586207 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26277372263 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42121322205 3.92707691288 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27401352775 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 139.433497537 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.715328467153 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 379.143842365 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8614355675 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1111111111 104.977214359 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2222222222 20.9669160288 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.12807881773 48% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284075231275 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116319626646 0.0925447433944 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799081011947 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229904140284 0.151781067708 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921596712094 0.0609392437508 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 55.0591133005 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 22.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.