Do you think consumers should avoid the purchase of over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers to avoid extra packaging of products Give your views with any relevant example pf your own experience

Essay topics:

Do you think consumers should avoid the purchase of over-packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views with any relevant example pf your own experience.

Daily, lots of products on markets draw the attention of potential consumers. they come in various forms of packaging, often overly done. In this essay, I am going to argue that consumers should avoid over-packaged products rather than leaving the responsibility to the producers.

producers choose over-packaging tactics for various reasons. they may want to make the product more appealing by using luxurious cover. On the other hand, they may want over-packaging to reduce the number of merchandising goods. Regardless of their reason, the fact is that it would be hard for the producers to change their marketing tactics once it is set up. If it is left for the producers to take the responsibility of less packaging, it would be less likely to happen.

However, when consumers take action in the market, their effect shows clearly in the revenue. The popular products will be sold out first and it will accelerate the trend by the word of mouth. consumers have the power to change the market trend. Their impact works faster as the producers would need to adapt to the change.

People easily come across over-packaged products. they came out in the market because producers strategically chose and designed. As we as consumers have the power to change the market trend, we should choose less packaged and environmentally friendly products.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-02-03 Aruna Matta 55 view
2019-06-13 milad21rz 88 view
2018-12-25 milad21rz 88 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...w the attention of potential consumers. they come in various forms of packaging, oft...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Producers
...the responsibility to the producers. producers choose over-packaging tactics for vario...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...-packaging tactics for various reasons. they may want to make the product more appea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consumers
...elerate the trend by the word of mouth. consumers have the power to change the market tre...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ily come across over-packaged products. they came out in the market because producer...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12669683258 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89236913724 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552036199095 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7236642664 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.5333333333 104.977214359 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7333333333 20.9669160288 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.06666666667 7.25397266985 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212950355996 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726829006769 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633177350713 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136761589878 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600029339799 0.0609392437508 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 12.6369458128 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.1260098522 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.9458128079 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 55.0591133005 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.