Do you think consumers should avoid the purchase of over-packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views with any relevant example pf your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of purchasing over-packaged products and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of buying necessary stuff is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that avoiding extra packaging can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, consumers' responsibility can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of beautiful packages, as well as industrial revolution, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered modern packaging methods in facilitated factories. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both preserving the nature and eco-friendly factories apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, producers' responsibility might increase the consequences of well-designed goods. Moreover, fundamental aspects of traditional production methods might relate to this reality that the demerits of useless devices in companies pertain to old-fashioned products. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of safe packaging is correlated negatively with wrecked devices. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of safe production lines.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believe that the benefits of extra packaging of products far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of consumerism prove the significance of useful products, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy. Is it a blessing or a curse? 85
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make a better network for public transport orshould build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 85
- The university will deduct the student’s score for late assignments, opinions and solutions. 85
- Some say that in today's world the value of humanities has been eclipsed by the necessity of preparing for specific wealth-producing careers, such as medicine. Discuss whether you think there is a role in today's changing world for the study of 77
- The environment we live in is in danger due to various global problems. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96911196911 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.56692400888 2.71678728327 131% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671814671815 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3958691646 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.833333333 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221873287593 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677212428323 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500824336063 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115064791447 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280470531819 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.