Does digital age make people more knowledgeable? Agree/Disagree
In the tech-savvy era, the phenomenon of digital technology and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although many people contest that the digital age is responsible for increased knowledge, others disagree with this notion. This essay will agree with the proposition that digital period is providing an influx of knowledge to human beings.
There are a plethora of reasons in favour of the creative age in which the most preponderant one is that people have easy and fast access to information all over the world. In addition, this convenient approach to the statistical and realistic data across the globe is spreading the knowledge and broadening the horizons of the people. For example, a recent study showed that, with the advent of digital media, people are well aware of the latest happenings and knowledgeable. Consequently, the role of digital technology in providing knowledge is instrumental indeed.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that the people from diverse backgrounds, ethnicities and races are interconnected by digital internet which results in the exchanging of the bulk of ideas and characteristics thereby boosting the knowledge of the significant amount of people. Moreover, people learn about different cultures and traditions with the help of this electronic medium. For instance, research revealed that people are more knowledgeable about other nations today as compared to the past. Manifestly, the digital age is playing an important role in instilling the knowledge into the people.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the prominence of the digital era which is making people knowledgeable about easy access to the information and knowing of international cultures. Therefore, I strongly opine that digital innovation has made people knowledgeable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-11 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 77 | view |
- Governments and international institution are faced with many global problems. What these problems could be? Solution? 85
- Travel is overrated today, because people can get the information without leaving home. Discuss whether travel should be conclusded as part of the quality education. 77
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or is it the responsibility of producers, discuss. 77
- belching and unauthorized behaviour in offices, discuss 88
- With the increase of digital media available online, the roel of the library has become abolete. Universities should only procure digital media rather than contantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and gi 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58483754513 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09955497922 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545126353791 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9987482781 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375010210887 0.242375264174 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124032215366 0.0925447433944 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053439733212 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223250089677 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262704046419 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.