eating food
The importance of such as eating the same food which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the latter proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that mostly people focus fast food. Consequently, fast food is not best for health. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that fast food only one day eating one week. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects that individual mostly focus fast food but not good for health because increase the diseases. Besides, food is very effective for people health such as eating the food. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of this trend.
According to arguments the aforementioned one can reach to a conclusion that the effect of food is very dangers for people health so individual most focus on the home food and fruits are indeed too great to
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... food and fruits are indeed too great to
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, so, thus, while, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93162393162 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52775158753 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6419532553 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1666666667 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300905284135 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125062020614 0.0925447433944 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14312858735 0.071462118173 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208835452015 0.151781067708 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745174710801 0.0609392437508 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.