cars and airplane
The importance of cars and airplane which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the latter proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that mostly people use is cars. Consequently, cares is very useful many people because nowadays modern culture. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that mostly people focus cars because safety in the winter weather. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects of nowadays care is very useful all individual please no use for children's hand. Beside, cars the essential item of in modern life. Hence, it is apparent why many are favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of cars and airplane in modern life are indeed too a great to ignore.
- Children in many countries are eating more fast food and convenience snacks. Why are children doing this and how serious are the consequences? 79
- technological access to online music 77
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? pros and cons? 80
- investment in arts music and painting 80
- science and mathematics 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0814479638 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61128708753 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592760180995 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4993131816 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5833333333 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171138930482 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647544045185 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967057274706 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122824215651 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820795554578 0.0609392437508 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 87.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 79.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.