Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract each other. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.
Recently the phenomenon of studies with work and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that studies and employment distract each other, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that studies and employment may go hand in hand and will analyze it throughout this essay.
To begin with the sociological standpoint, employment can impact studies with noticeable effects which is rooted in the fact that time constraints and mental diversion are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience as a university student, an academic experiment conducted by us discovered those students who were working part time got lower grades in theoretical subjects in comparison with the non-workers. Thus, the negative ramification of doing job while academics can be seen apparently.
In contrast, within the realm of financial shape, student employment might decrease the financial pressure of hefty university tuition fees .Moreover, the fundamental aspect of working experience relate to this reality that merits of practicality in the studies shows great exposure to the practical world. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by students of prestigious university has asserted the upside of the students working is correlated positively when acquiring a full time job. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of employment during studies is a disguised blessing.
To recapitulate, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe the benefits of acquiring a job simultaneously with studies far outweigh its drawbacks.
- Lifestyle affects health, how should health/ medical department responds? 88
- team sports are generally prompted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between the rival supporters and other form of antisocial behavior. If sporting events can 88
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most agr 88
- Communication has evolved significantly in the last decade. Discuss pros and cons impacts. 80
- Some people think law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...covered those students who were working part time got lower grades in theoretical subject...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ressure of hefty university tuition fees .Moreover, the fundamental aspect of work...
^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ssure of hefty university tuition fees .Moreover, the fundamental aspect of working expe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 493, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... correlated positively when acquiring a full time job. Hence, it is correct to presume th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65758754864 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20450163311 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630350194553 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.5560996343 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.4 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194144021295 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775573308929 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458033672822 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112839270335 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433447196414 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.