Experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
The importance of Experience is more effective way to teach, toward books, which has always been debatable, has now upsurged a lot of arguments in favor and against it, thus it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of Experience is more effective way to teach towards books has sparked the controversy over the potential of this in an integral part of the society in recent year. It can be agreed that upside of Experience is more effective way to teach, toward books is instrumental indeed, however it has some various drawbacks as well. This easy will be elaborate both assertion and will provide to a well- weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why Experience is more effective way to teach towards books is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that experience is most important because some time books language is very complicated so that time experienced teacher provide the best education to student because she or he know about level of students easily.
However, there are some people who choose to think differently and hold o opposing viewpoint. Which Can certainly potential influence of Experience is more effective way to teach, toward books/ Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that some teachers use their own experience for teach but all student are not capable for learn orally they always cramming from books and pass their exam.. It is apparent that the downside of Experience is more effective way to teach towards books cannot be overlooked.
The above-presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of Experience is more effective way to teach, toward to books. While it is evident that it has various benefits, although its deleterious effects cannot be ignored and have to be addressed and well balanced against its merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-10 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-08-15 | Rafia Jawad | 88 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
- The Government reduce their investment in arts, music and painting agree or disagree 77
- Should university penalize student for late submission their work? 77
- credit card advantages or disadvantages you are agree or disagree 11
- Machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation and there is no prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people 77
- Experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'books'' or 'book's'?
Suggestion: books'; book's
...nce is most important because some time books language is very complicated so that ti...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'knows'.
Suggestion: knows
... education to student because she or he know about level of students easily. Howev...
^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...contradiction is rooted in the fact that some teachers use their own experience f...
^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... cramming from books and pass their exam.. It is apparent that the downside of Exp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.5418719212 218% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 304.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18092105263 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91260744277 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519736842105 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.6474489437 50.4703680194 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.5 104.977214359 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4 20.9669160288 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466555408702 0.242375264174 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219651181762 0.0925447433944 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146168777842 0.071462118173 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300976060058 0.151781067708 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892631805253 0.0609392437508 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.