Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of effective teaching ways and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of agreeing to study books are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that practical experiences can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, effective ways of teaching can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of efficient e-books, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of brilliant teachers. Thus, beneficial ramifications of useful education are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, inefficient experiences can provide the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of practical courses are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described useless teaching. Hence, predicted outcomes of atrocious means are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of effective teaching methods far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of tremendous experiences prove the significance of an academic book, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-10 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-08-15 | Rafia Jawad | 88 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
- All examinations in some countries take place at the end of the academic year but others spread out throughout an academic year s Pros Cons 85
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects Do you agree or disagree Give examples from your experience 88
- Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition 85
- What is your idea about lazy journalism that is commonplace in the digitalized world 77
- What is your opinion on deducting marks on the student s work if it is late 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77027027027 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22320196743 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657657657658 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0203196189 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.454545455 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218110249557 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648318169992 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054514935101 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121821277066 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601622615422 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.