experimental learning, traditional learning in high school and university. agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning by experiment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of learning new skills is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that traditional subjects can be a plus, and I will analyse that through this essay.
From an educational standpoint, traditional subjects can give the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that physics as well as chemistry, are inextricably bound up. When I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the new skills such as research methodology, interpersonal skills, and time management. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both physical and mental apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychology, experimental leaning might increase the consequences of risking life. Moreover, fundamental aspects of doing research on the lab relate to this reality that the demerits of the wrong experiment pertain to heath problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of this learning is correlated negatively with social behaviour. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of being practical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of traditional learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of learning skills prove the significance of being good in the society, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-21 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-03-21 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-03-21 | dhavalpatel095 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, what are the positive and negative impact on life and work. 85
- If you are assigned to work on a study on climate change, what will you choose to focus on and why? 11
- More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree? 88
- If you are assigned to work on a study on climate change, what will you choose to focus on and why? 11
- Some universities deduct marks from students’ works if given in late, what are the problems and what is your opinion? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62204724409 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24767595286 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625984251969 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8377548627 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119792189281 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388046382984 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313056261214 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715755381594 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371490256939 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.