Gerontologist claim that they can increase human life to 500 years in a few decades. Do you think it would have a positive impact or a negative impact on human society? Share your views with necessary observations.
Throughout history, mankind has made significant advances in the field of medicine resulting in a significant increase in life expectancy. Now, gerontologists claim that lifespan of humans would increase to 500 years in a matter of a few decades. Some people are of the opinion that this would result in a positive impact on human society whereas other hold contrary views. This essay will discuss why increasing human life to 500 years will have greater demerits.
Firstly, human bodies are designed to function for about a century and not beyond. Synthetically modified bodies may be able to survive for five times that number, but it would be with its own set of troubles and problems. For instance, genetically modified bodies may require a significant amount of money for keeping the organs including the skin functioning. Thus, it may be a costly affair to be able to sustain our bodies for that long.
Additionally, living for 500 years may strain on our natural resources. With increasing population and increased life expectancy, the demand for even the basic resources such as food, clothing and shelter may become difficult to satiate. For instance, if an average person lives for 500 years instead of 100 years, the demand for jobs would increase fivefold. Thus, it is clear that this disproportionate increase in demand would create an ecological imbalance.
To conclude, this essay discussed how increasing life to 500 years would create an imbalance in nature and drain on a huge amount of money. In my opinion, it is imperative that resources and efforts should instead be directed towards the welfare of the underprivileged.
- Urban sprawl is an increasing issue around the world. One way in which to solve this issue is to construct cities vertically rather than horizontally. Are such cities a good idea? 80
- Gerontologist claim that they can increase human life to 500 years in a few decades. Do you think it would have a positive impact or a negative impact on human society? Share your views with necessary observations. 72
- Out of the three inventions- computers, antibiotics and motor vehicles, which one do you think is the most important invention. Share your views with suitable examples and observations. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, thus, whereas, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14498141264 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88095694805 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557620817844 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0620036364 50.4703680194 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.8571428571 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237956674289 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925472751576 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946612145983 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149786563177 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123383948188 0.0609392437508 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.