Globalization
Recently, the importance of globalization as a phenomenon and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of intercultural communication is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that achieving a global village can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, being able to have businesses running in the commerce and trade sector internationally can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of cultural diversity, as well as community development, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the history of globalization. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both international relations and the world's happiness apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, a lack of improvement in globalization might increase the consequences of energy consumption. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of sustainability could relate to this reality that the demerits of saving our ecosystems pertain to better global connectivity. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of having sanctions is correlated negatively with deglobalization. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of being independent as a country.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having a globalized world far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of globalization prove the significance of international trade, but also pinpoint world communication implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | me-run | 85 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | Alireza.r.m | 93 | view |
| 2020-11-17 | Behnaz fallah | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...of both international relations and the worlds happiness apparently can be seen. Wi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80727272727 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.60788851049 2.71678728327 133% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654545454545 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4020103368 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.083333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268273687181 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100074314315 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101052620399 0.071462118173 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167545594259 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985089739141 0.0609392437508 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.