A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation. Do you agree or disagree?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in a good listener. There is a widespread worry that will
only
lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However,
I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay. There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that a good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation can not contribute to but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range
of advantages it offers, not only can one benefits more when it comes to being effective
,but
they can also enhance the
productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned. There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of a good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation. The primary one stems from the fact that by
conserving
the aforementioned trend, people have not only
realized
its gravity, but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussions when it comes to today's ever-changing lifestyle. Besides, its impact on is far-reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent why many are against to a good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation. In view of the arguments outlined above, one
can
conclude that despite some drawbacks, the benefits of a good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-05-24 | Sridarani | 69 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-01-22 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
- Government should create better network of public transport available for everyone or build more roads owning population. 77
- The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce the traffic congestion and pollution. to what extent do you agree or disagree. 75
- music is very important 72
- environment 77
- government should reduce their investment 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r. There is a widespread worry that will only lead to a myriad of concerns in o...
^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... only lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accep...
^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s more when it comes to being effective ,but they can also enhance the product...
^^
Line 8, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... primary one stems from the fact that by conserving the aforementioned trend, p...
^^^
Line 10, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orementioned trend, people have not only realized its gravity, but also gauged ...
^^^
Line 12, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iew of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbac...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78647686833 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7645955058 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501779359431 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4728725957 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.083333333 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.12807881773 218% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389430621077 0.242375264174 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15266320129 0.0925447433944 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182154354236 0.071462118173 255% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148439360853 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159759153082 0.0609392437508 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 69.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 62.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.