However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high schools or colleges?
Recently, the phenomenon of others think a traditional form of teaching is the best and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of this complicated procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that experiential learning is beneficial in high schools or colleges can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, a traditional form of teaching and experiential learning are beneficial in high schools and colleges can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact the crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and complex procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, in high schools and colleges, experiential learning and traditional form of teaching are highly beneficial might increase the consequences of critical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downward of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sided, I profoundly believe that benefits of thinking about a traditional form of teaching in high schools and colleges is better than experiential learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | Prabu | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Prabu | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-08 | baran.bahrani | 85 | view |
| 2018-12-20 | brandnewiman | 88 | view |
- As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an aging population for individuals and society? Support your 85
- Large shopping malls are replacing by small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience, is it a positive development? 85
- Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education, or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their conditions? 88
- What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics or the airplane. Why? explain with examples. 88
- Company's top-level authorities should get their employees in the decision-making process. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67944250871 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28079449587 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588850174216 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.5173707143 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.181818182 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394270139651 0.242375264174 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131113111434 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129881240969 0.071462118173 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235850679653 0.151781067708 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569763021664 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.