importance of cashless society
The importance of cashless society is becoming a reality as well as more and more people are using credit cards for payment and less people use cash which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the latter proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive and negative impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that are the credit card are very useful for every people and they can go outside have any need to carry many things. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
On the other side, elaborating my viewpoint there are some merits but one of the crucial effects is that when they are going travel outside then I use credit card. Hence, it is apparent why many are against in favor of this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2021-02-02 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | honorrr | 55 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | honorrr | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... are using credit cards for payment and less people use cash which was always debata...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, so, then, thus, well, while, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 1207.87684729 80% => OK
No of words: 202.0 242.827586207 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76237623762 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37932967143 2.71678728327 88% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628712871287 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 379.143842365 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.6358729608 50.4703680194 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.25397266985 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0735799732356 0.242375264174 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0216732655266 0.0925447433944 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057342070682 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.037733388428 0.151781067708 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533630696692 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.1260098522 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 55.0591133005 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.