The issue which frequently generates a great deal of heated debate is companies can progress by good communion, collaboration between the employers and staff and the problem is certainly discussed in contemporary world. Many academics contend that companies can progress by good comunion, collaboration between the employers and staff. This essay will express the complete agreement with this notion and will justify my viewpoint.
To commence wiyh, there are wide range argument to support the aforementioned statment however, the most conspicuous one lies in, fact is not remote or complicated. But accessible and practical. It has long been considered perfectly justified by proponents to assume that employes and staff's confidence level up. Furthermore, it is asserted that understanding in employers and staff members. A classic example of occuring is statistics revealed by UN clearly demonstrates that approximately sixty of the nations worldwide prefer to follow this trend.
Another convincing fact to ascertain this is. Besides, it seems incontrovertible that. A relevant example is nations world over have observed a dramatic shift in the opinion of public regarding this issue.
In the view of argument discussed above, it is my considered opinion that advantages overweight the disadvantages.
The issue which frequently generates a great deal of heated debate is companies can progress by good communion, collaboration between the employers and staff and the problem is certainly discussed in contemporary world. Many academics contend that companies can progress by good communion, collaboration between the employers and staff. this essay will express the complete agreement with this notion and will justify my viewpoint.
To commence with, there are wide range argument to support the aforementioned statement however, the most conspicuous one lies in, fact is not remote or complicated. But accessible and practical. it has long been considered perfectly justified by proponents to assume that employes and staff's confidence level up. Furthermore, it is asserted that understanding in employers and staff members. A classic example of occurring is statistics revealed by UN clearly demonstrates that approximately sixty of the nations worldwide prefer to follow this trend.
Another convincing fact to ascertain this is. Besides, it seems incontrovertible that. A relevant example is nations world over have observed a dramatic shift in the opinion of public regarding this issue.
In the view of argument discussed above, it is my considered opinion that advantages overweight the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-24 | Simranjot7087 | 55 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this Phenomenon? 77
- Sedentary lifestyle has devastated the lives of millennial's 55
- Technology access to online music and the like should be free or paid. 72
- The issue which frequently generates a great deal of heated debate is companies can progress by good communion, collaboration between the employers and staff and the problem is certainly discussed in contemporary world. Many academics contend that compani 55
- some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ration between the employers and staff. this essay will express the complete agreeme...
^^^^
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...plicated. But accessible and practical. it has long been considered perfectly just...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vantages overweight the disadvantages.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 196.0 242.827586207 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72448979592 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.92707691288 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22282635988 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647959183673 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5269921525 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426281800996 0.242375264174 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139453939402 0.0925447433944 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.274323122348 0.071462118173 384% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209833186726 0.151781067708 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.303698149662 0.0609392437508 498% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.1260098522 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.