it is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature, give an example.
Recently, the phenomenon of the importance of studying a film at school for children to learn literature and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that studying a film at school can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the benefits of learning literature at school can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated
procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, schools’ important roles for children to study a film at school to literature might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious
university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning literature by studying a film far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Mohammad1364 | 88 | view |
- Do you think extreme sports like skiing, water rafting etc. are dangerous and should be prohibited? 88
- Whether experimental learning/practical learning can work well in formal education/traditional teaching, agree or disagree?orExperience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 85
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this essay. From a general standpoint, the benefits of learning literature at s...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Procedures
...henomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen. Within the re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: University
... research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65168539326 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29243521018 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629213483146 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9985536929 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.181818182 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.12807881773 145% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315066960897 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1070799443 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13066849739 0.071462118173 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133652647433 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134135198139 0.0609392437508 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.