Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh this disadvantages?
Lots of museums charge fees while others do not. In my opinion, it is important to everyone access to relics and arts then generating money. Therefore, I think that the benefits of charging people fees do not outweigh the backdrowns. The governments should supply free cost in any events related culture and custom.
On the other hand, there are someone who argue that museums might unsustainable without charge fees. There are some reasons for this ideas. Firstly, some people works in the museums who cannot earn money from tickets sales if the museums are free for everybody. Besides, people can get more knowledge and experience when go there, rather than none at all. They pay money and they have more knowledge about culture of the country. So, I think that the governments supply the money for these places and encounrage people going there to development both knowledge and experience aspect.
On the other hand, there are many disadvantages for this charging fees. Firstly, this can restricted the high proportion of the population coming the museums, especially in less development countries. Many people in poorer countries just have enough for food and accommodation. In additions, childrens and students cannot visit the museums because they does not have enough money for tickets. It is really a huge hole for education in the country. Children and students have more curiously for the outside world. So, this can restricted for their research.
In conclusion, I think that the government should cover the cost for the museums as another places because culture and custom plays an important role than any things so that everyone in the world can get more opportunities to research in the real life.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-05-16 | ahmedradjik | 55 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh this disadvantages? 55
- Too much emphasis is placed on going to university for academic study. People should be encouraged to do vocational training, because there is a lack of qualified tradespeople such as electricians or plumbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- People often go to developed countries for higher studies because they believe that this gives them a better platform to become competent in the international arena. How far you agree with this statement? 55
- Nowadays most green energy is becoming evermore prevalent in both developed and developing countries. Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment, others believe they are a serious threat to energy security. Discuss both views 78
- Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us want to be and to look the same. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...charge fees. There are some reasons for this ideas. Firstly, some people works in th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...s cannot visit the museums because they does not have enough money for tickets. It i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, really, so, then, therefore, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09219858156 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6112488954 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.6461143818 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7777777778 104.977214359 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.9669160288 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382618677534 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128019319244 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104020289653 0.071462118173 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221129629217 0.151781067708 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728864542772 0.0609392437508 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.32886699507 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.94827586207 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.