Recently, the phenomenon of the effect of environments on success and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of achieving accomplishments is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that people's success can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, people's accomplishments can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the success rate, as well as growing up in poverty, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the relationship between unsafe environments and a suitable place. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both unsuccessful people and unsuitable workplaces apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the disadvantages of unsuccessfulness might increase the consequences of a friendly environment. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of accomplishment steps could relate to this reality that the demerits of successful people pertain to the place of birth. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of massive success is correlated negatively with a peaceful environment. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of unstable environments.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of successful places far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of habits of successful people prove the significance of environmental influences, but also pinpoint successful conditions implications.
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 73
- Some people think human behaviors can be limited by laws others think laws have little effect What is your opinion 78
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do Deforestation pollution global warming Government increase taxes improve public transport renewabl 78
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 73
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 61
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67272727273 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48212151539 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629090909091 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9579816271 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275509483535 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873127209537 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660728246517 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161319870769 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331533701214 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67272727273 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48212151539 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629090909091 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9579816271 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275509483535 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873127209537 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660728246517 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161319870769 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331533701214 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.