Many people think that regions affect successful person. What is your opinion about native region and accomplished person’s influence on the region he belongs to.
Recently, the influence of the accomplished person or an appropriate region has become a long running dispute, which leads to a moot question, “whether a sound area and a successful person has the positive impact on the well-being of others or not?” It is widely held view that the social environment and networks is highly beneficial, where I tend to believe that how region influence people getting success.
At the outset, there are diverse approaches why regions influence successful person is consider as dynamic but the most conspicuous one stems from the region provides relationships and social networks. First and foremost is that living in a country with acceptable social structure give youth to know their abilities as well interest to find job opportunity and enjoy high living standard. Secondly, it can be further argued that interaction with successful peers that have achieved remarkable place will encourage others to follow their approach in terms of education and business. In addition to this information, it can be mentioned that peer pressure to commit crime or violence acts can tempt youth to deteriorate their future life.
However, there is no doubt that being under effects of people and region provides people with various points. It can be taken into account that the most of prosperous scientists could reach the summit of prosperity just with hardworking. Moreover, it is quite clear that people are able to increase their earning capacity or promote the education just by enough personal and intellectual skills.
To sum up, I firmly believe that the facilities of regions and the number of successful people must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and people are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-10 | viviana | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | Sidra018 | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-22 | Rajnikant Chauhan | 77 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | Rohit mahajan | 55 | view |
| 2018-09-13 | sara malla | 85 | view |
- You recently did a short cookery course The cookery school has asked for your feedback on this course Write a letter to the course director at the cookery school In your letter describe what you enjoyed about the course say how much cooking you ve done si 81
- Technological innovations have affected our lives. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- “In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed’: Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 80
- Creativity is inborn skill or can be developed through learning? Your opinion 77
- The illiterates of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Agree or Disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
... regions influence successful person is consider as dynamic but the most conspicuous one...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... but the most conspicuous one stems from the region provides relationships and so...
^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n be taken into account that the most of prosperous scientists could reach the su...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, no doubt, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31186440678 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87142856122 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.3496250741 50.4703680194 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.7 104.977214359 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.9669160288 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.25397266985 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257515364647 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968132047834 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106015901208 0.071462118173 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163818973679 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840646451205 0.0609392437508 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 9.94827586207 281% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.