The means of communicating in society has changed markedly over the last ten years. In your opinion, what are the positive and negative impacts of this change?
In recent years, there has been a tremendous change in the way humans communicate worldwide. Although most people argue that it has been extremely beneficial for human civilization, others oppose this idea. This essay will discuss both sides and provide reasons why advancements in communication modes have played a pivotal role in our contemporary world.
To begin with, one strong argument among the opponents of current modes of communication is the increased malicious activity occurring using devices such as mobiles, computers and other hand-held devices. Even though these devices were designed to augment human connectivity, they are increasingly used to spread fake news, hatred, violence and uncensored content. For instance, terrorists are making use of the dark web in order to deal with arms and ammunition. In addition, there has been a sharp rise in cases related to the hacking of devices with the intent to steal information or other nefarious activities.
However, several arguments support the use of communicating devices to revolutionize human connectivity and sharing of information. Firstly, it has enabled families to remain connected irrespective of geographical distances. Earlier, for instance, people used to send letters to their loved-ones which took numerous days to reach its desired destination, whereas conventional devices enable the transfer of information in real-time. Therefore, humans are more aware of their surroundings and are capable of making informed decisions. If it was not for the Internet, social networking apps like Whatsapp, Facebook and Instagram would have never existed.
To conclude, despite issues pertaining to the malicious use of communication technologies, the benefits far outweigh the negatives. In my opinion, not only has it enabled humans to live a better social life but also provided countless employment opportunities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | bellawuyun | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | richierich25 | 11 | view |
| 2019-03-22 | milad21rz | 88 | view |
| 2018-09-05 | Anonymous | 80 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems. Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems. 11
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. Agree or disagree. 77
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in addition, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70422535211 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12833832798 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669014084507 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9253761715 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.25397266985 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0755285660937 0.242375264174 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284893143283 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469620227053 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0516736180264 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495940455974 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.