Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the impact of medical technology on human life expectancy. Some people think that advacement in medicine has not resulted in any increase in average human life, while others maintain that by the advent of latest medical technologies and medicines, average human life has increased. This essay will discuss that how medical technology has enhanced human life expectancy.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with advancement in medicine as sole responsible for increase in average human life. Firstly, the most conspicuous is the cure from deadly diseases. Before, the advent of latest medical techniques, precious human lives were lost because of common diseases, for example, black fever, cholera and malaria. As a result, it is quite evident that invention of new medical methodologies has not only resulted as cure for all deadly diseases but has also enhanced average human life.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that increase in avergae human age has ensued more burden on the government. Therefore, governments are required to fulfill and meet the employment, health and food demands of old aged people. For instance, instead of allocating ample amount of budget to education, a heavy amount is now being dedicated to medicine to cater for the requirements of old aged people. As a matter of fact, advancement in medicine has also resulted in increase of burden on government.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that development in medical technology has bestowed numerous benefits which not only provide cure from deadly as well as common diseases but also enhance average human life.
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion? 85
- Do you think the consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 77
- “Students should be required to stay at school until the age of eighteen.” To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and / or examples from your own experiences. 77
- Should voting be compulsory for all citizens or people should have freedom to choose not to vote. What is your opinion? 78
- It is a more effective way to learn to work as a team than to work on one’s own. Do you agree or disagree? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...hile others maintain that by the advent of latest medical technologies and medicines, ave...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...rom deadly diseases. Before, the advent of latest medical techniques, precious human live...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emands of old aged people. For instance, instead of allocating ample amount of bu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36727272727 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79706103137 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538181818182 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0723438502 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4166666667 7.25397266985 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26934260217 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106651370372 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856614070814 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166605579612 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935264900648 0.0609392437508 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.