Should governments build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve network of public transport?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the enhancement of expansion of road’s or uplifting of public transport network. Some people think that public transport setup should be improved, while others maintain that instead of improving public transport more numbers of road should be built. This essay will discuss the benefits of building new road network.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with the building of new roads. Firstly, the most consipcuous is the expansion of road network within the country. Therefore, building more roads will not only expand the road network but also increase the connectivity within the country. As an example, building new roads can overcome the remote connectivity as far flung rural areas will be connected with major cities. As a matter of fact, it is quite evident that buildings more roads will immensely reduce time between remote and big cities.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining this argument is that newly built wide roads will not wholly ensue in increase of private cars but covnersely public transport network can also be extended on these road networks. As an example, instead of improving public transport service within the city area, governments can commence a cheaper transport service to facilitiate it poor citizens travelling to cities from villages. As a matter of fact, instead of car owners, poor citizens will also be accomodated by building new roads.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that goverment should build more roads rather than improving public transport network to increase the connectivity between remote and major areas as well as facilitate its poor people too.
- Nowadays many young people leave home at an early age to either study or work in another city. Do you think this has more advantages or disadvantages for young people. 77
- The claim that animals have "rights" has been subject to much of a debate since 1970. Are zoos helping or hurting animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 77
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion? 85
- environment pollution. 75
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion? 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, while, as a matter of fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38827838828 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67694653448 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.761604554 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.583333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.25397266985 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39515857721 0.242375264174 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15571785234 0.0925447433944 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917267914322 0.071462118173 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271955211979 0.151781067708 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784230417296 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.