Medical technology is responsible for a human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the responsibility of medical technology for the human's life expectancy has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that medical technology responsibilities can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the importance of medical technology for the human's life expectancy can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered current policies. Then, the beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and complicated procedures can apparently be seen.
Within the realm of science, the responsibilities of medical technology analysis might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of non-creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of medical technologies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
- Medical technology is responsible for a human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Life experience is a better teacher than a school or foreign education. Give an example and support opinion. 88
- The university will deduct the student’s score for late assignments, opinions and solutions. 88
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give an example. 77
- What roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...nsibility of medical technology for the humans life expectancy has sparked a heated de...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...mportance of medical technology for the humans life expectancy can provide the society...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79674796748 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39825971333 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642276422764 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1604886786 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.636363636 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201505150547 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741159694566 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919041044568 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114671397498 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548207306878 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.