Medical technology is responsible for the human’s
life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
The importance of life of expectancy of people is increasing due to the drastic development in medical science was always a debatable topic. Many people are considering this as the greatest achievement of technology. Others reject this notion and don't see this as positive development. In my opinion, latter proposition appears to be more rational. The following essay would further elaborate both sides with necessary evidence and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To start with, there is no denying fact that due to development in medical field has increased the life expectancy of people. A recent data shows that average death of person has increased from 46.7 in 1990 to 59.4 in 2016. The above data shows that humans are making health-related decisions and this achievement can be attributed to improvement in public health and medical care. For example, new invention in medical field had found solutions to many dreadful diseases such as cancer, HIV and many.
However, there are many pitfalls with the improvement in life expectancy, old people are living more and more so due to that there is an increase in financial burden on families like regular health checkups and daily visits to hospital regularly. It's good that one can stay with family for long years but financial burden can cause conflict within the family. In addition, living long life means a less working force for the country in terms of prosperity and less growth. Further, it causes increasing in population and creates so many problems like poverty in people, the lack of basic facilities and many more problems.
To conclude, advancements in medical technology creates disadvantages rather than creating advantages for future life. In a nutshell, it can be concluded that an increase in average life expectancy rate can put up the burden on environment and society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-08 | jomerad@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-29 | Hundal | 77 | view |
| 2017-11-23 | alireza-kia | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...chnology. Others reject this notion and dont see this as positive development. In my...
^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...c health and medical care. For example, new invention in medical field had found solutions to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 302.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16887417219 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8184254849 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572847682119 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7143483569 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.066666667 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0853562586272 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281861448072 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336058960058 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0543644585111 0.151781067708 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027044746567 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.