"More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree with statement?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in relying on online material or library books. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in society. In my opinion, library books are more reliable and useful than online information as it has more positive impacts than negatives in society.
On the hand, critics may point out that one of the most significant benefits of using online books is that they are free, easily accessible and contains the latest information. For example, students, unlike in the past now have more addicted to the use of tech gadgets, as they can refer most of the information in their convenient time.
On the other hand, there are many arguments in favour of my stance. One of the most preponderant ones is by going to the library and gaining information as it has some positive consequences for the community. Firstly, library books give accurate information because many scholars verified them. According to, "Times magazine December 2019 edition", the proportion of books information's reliability has increased from 60 per cent to 80% today. Secondly, a large portion of the books gives the reader the feel of learning something which is not possible through online sources.
Lastly, in my opinion, the government of Australia is taking a great initiative in educating its citizen on the impact of getting information through books. Citizens are being encouraged to spend a significant portion of their time in understanding the importance of real books to compensate for the problems.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some benefits, the drawbacks of relying entirely on online sources instead of books in the society are indeed too dire to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-16 | Shashank7976 | 80 | view |
| 2020-05-29 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 31.9359605911 163% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11824324324 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84496972233 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560810810811 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4257450231 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.538461538 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223197753041 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770779298755 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616168758589 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117312976733 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584637244117 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.