Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem to have less free time. In your opinion, has technology improved the quality of life or made it more complicated? Support your arguments with reasons and/or examples from your own experience and observations.
The exponential growth of technology has changed the quality our lives tremendously. Some people think that the changes incurred by technology has increased the quality of life, while others maintain that technology has made our lives far too complicated. In the elucidating paragraphs, this essay will discuss that how the technology has reshaped and made our lives easier.
Firstly, technological advancements have proved to be as a good omen in our lives. Undoubtedly, the advent of various gadgets like vacuum cleaners and washing machines have resulted in less time consumption and generated more free time slots in our personal lives. Moreover, the dawn of new technology has also introduced the idea of multitasking. As an example, an individual can save ample of his time by carrying out more than one tasks simultaneously. Therefore, for no reason it be said that technology has not improved our quality of life.
Furthermore, the introduction of various equipment and gadgetries has eliminated the requirement of labour essential to carry out numerous tasks. This provides an individual an enhanced exposure towards every walk of life and has also eased our extra financial burden resulted by involving labours. For instance, the use of drilling machines and various latest handy tools in our daily household has made us lesser dependent on labours.
To conclude based on aforementioned facts technology has brought increased the quality of our lives. This essay has discussed that how we can generate extra time and reduce the labour dependency by using state of the art gadgets.
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities Do you agree or disagree 55
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples 72
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 77
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 55
- the graph shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks betweem 1978 and 2009 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ltaneously. Therefore, for no reason it be said that technology has not improved o...
^^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facts'' or 'fact's'?
Suggestion: facts'; fact's
... To conclude based on aforementioned facts technology has brought increased the qu...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...d reduce the labour dependency by using state of the art gadgets.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.5418719212 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33201581028 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97461753018 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581027667984 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7269499715 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.769230769 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0526697735393 0.242375264174 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0180082697062 0.0925447433944 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233397357144 0.071462118173 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0299722139707 0.151781067708 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202068829773 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.