Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion?
These days, there is a heated debate among people about the importance of television. There are a great number of individuals who interpret the impacts of watching TV as thoroughly constructive, while others hold an opponent’s view. I am inclined to believe that television is highly regarded as a main source of information, and it also becomes an indispensable part of our life.
There is no skepticism surrounding the fact that watching TV is a fast way to find out about the latest news from all over the world for most people. To be more precise, television plays a pivotal role in facilitating the diffusion of information, which might open avenues to new achievements. Hence, people’s enthusiasm and confidence will be amplified toward many daunting task, which also provokes them to do uphill struggle in order to achieve their goals.
In other words, television is considered as a convenient source of companion and entertainment. Furthermore, it is much more affordable compared with other means of entertainment. To put it more clearly, a survey conducted by Yale University in 2015 has found that media are powerful tools to amuse viewer around the world to hold families together. As a result, television serves the particular interest of individuals and groups.
In a nutshell, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that TV’s programs are beneficial in improving people’s knowledge and entertainment. From my point of view, TV has become an essential part of our everyday life.
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 80
- Actions speak louder than words. What is your opinion? 86
- Some people think that it is better for children to learn a foreign language at primary school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. And whether you support them or not. 11
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, while, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29218106996 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2480634494 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633744855967 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9354166063 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.166666667 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13752041302 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485941230114 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710013600488 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848260638128 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578604247688 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.