The effects of congestion, which was always debatable has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of sky trains have sparked the controversy over the potential impact on congestion in the recent years. It can be said that, using sky trains to solve the problem of congestion can have positive and negative effects. This essay will elaborate both these sides in greater details and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
As the outset, there are numerous advantages of using sky trains to solve congestion, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that traffic problem can be greatly reduced. People do not have wait for a long time in the traffic signal. Furthermore, using this advanced technology of sky trains can make the city look more beautiful and futuristic. Thus, using sky trains can be advantageous for congestion.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that sky trains have disadvantages than advantages. There are some reasons to back that up but the most salient one is that using sky trains can greatly affect the land on which it is build. For instance, the structural integrity of the land might lost and causing problems like earthquakes or building crashing down. Therefore, these people believes that sky trains should be avoided and some better alternative need to found to solve congestion.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that sky trains can be advantageous but at the same time, we should keep their drawbacks in mind.
- Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Cultural Shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the few possible options to eradicate this? 77
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010. 73
- Is that law can change the human behaviour? 72
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'solving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: solving
.... It can be said that, using sky trains to solve the problem of congestion can have posi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'solving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: solving
...numerous advantages of using sky trains to solve congestion, but the most conspicuous on...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0790513834 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75326447096 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569169960474 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1610223865 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8461538462 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302384557495 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109927078984 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679003243827 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178559236943 0.151781067708 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567205835939 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.