The only way for decreasing Air pollution is increasing fuel price, what is your opinion
Recently, the phenomanon of raising the price of gas, oil and gasoline with the pourpose of diminishing the air polution as an ultimate way and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this idea is beneficial as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that it can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, the idea of rising the price of fuel as a final sulotion to decrease the air polution provides the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of environmentalism. From my own experince, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these benefits. Firstly, this idea can affect the fuel demand and certainly decline it. Hence, inhabitants have to decrease their unnecessary travels and the amount of carbon dioxide emissions will be declined by them.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that the idea of increasing the fuel price in order to decreasing the air polutant has some opponents. According to research undertaken by a prestigious world-renowned university rasing fuel has some catastrophic effects on other parts of the society including economy, transportation, imports, exports and even industry. They asserted that governments should perform tye other schemes to clean the air.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly, believe that the merits of enhancing the fuel price and its effects on diminishing the air pollution are far more outweigh their demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-09-10 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 55 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 70 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 55 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree? 80
- In a social events, Being a good talker or a good listener which one is better 77
- Benefits and problems of studying and work related to old theatre play in high schools. Give your opinion with examples. 80
- Can the internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2808988764 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08198512773 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602996254682 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9292370267 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.181818182 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22195514375 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762383334516 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070312097973 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12730484432 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276959780798 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.