Parents are held legally responsible for their child actions. Do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day reveals that child cares by the parents has always been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain parents are held legally responsible for their child action. Regarding this, I would say that parents are not legally responsible for their child.
One compelling argument in favour of my stance on this issue has to with the fact that parents are held legally responsible for their child action. This is because job is necessity for everyone. So, guardians are doing jobs and have no time for their children. As a result, the children spent lot of time on social media like facebook, youtube and many more and they have saw some illegal things. To put this into perspective, a child saw some person to taking a drug and he also doing same thing which he saw.
Looking back at the introduction, one could also argue that parents have also don’t know what their children doing in outsides parents ignore all the activities which their child do. Due to this, the children doing some illegal activities like misbehaving with their elder, fighting with friends but no one can there for stop them for doing this. As a result
Hence, based on the argument above, we can conclude that parents give importance to their job not children but also parents ignore illegal activities of their children. Therefore, I believe that parents are held legal responsible for their children.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
2022-04-19 | Behnaz fallah | 85 | view |
2021-07-20 | ndiep | 77 | view |
2021-03-11 | sajeevan | 77 | view |
2021-02-02 | honorrr | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... legally responsible for their child. One compelling argument in favour of my ...
^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
...ok, youtube and many more and they have saw some illegal things. To put this into p...
^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...ome person to taking a drug and he also doing same thing which he saw. Looking b...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e also doing same thing which he saw. Looking back at the introduction, one co...
^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...could also argue that parents have also don’t know what their children doing in out...
^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...can there for stop them for doing this. As a result Hence, based on t...
^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or stop them for doing this. As a result Hence, based on the argument above, we c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d legal responsible for their children.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, look, regarding, so, therefore, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92164179104 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48798348423 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507462686567 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7824098044 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.461538462 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445991763804 0.242375264174 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197110455142 0.0925447433944 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147651296515 0.071462118173 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295114386648 0.151781067708 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319810309962 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.32886699507 90% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.