Often, kids behave in an unacceptable manner. Sometimes in a way, that is not taught by parents. It leads to a moot question that, “who is responsible?” Since, several studies on developmental psychology have found that children are, essentially, a blank slate. So I think that parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. By taking this into account, we will analyse how kids learn things by observing and by the teaching of the parents.
To begin with, it is said that, ‘children are like a sponge, they absorb and imitate everything they observe. For example, in a developing stage, a child learns language, culture, manners by observing his parents. So, if parents speak in an abusive way, it is most likely that child will observe and imitate their use of profanity. This example clearly proves that parents are responsible for that kid’s coarse language. Thus, they must be legally bound for kids acts.
Moreover, it’s parent’s duty to teach social behaviour to their children and to discipline them. Say, for instance, if a kid goes to the neighbor’s house and bring home couple of toys he liked, it’s parents responsibility to discipline him and teach him not to take anyone’s anything without permission. This clearly exemplifies that there is an obvious link between parent’s teaching and their children’s acts. Thus, parents must be legally liable their children’s acts.
These analysis prove that kids act in a way they are brought up by their parents and based on the things they are exposed to. In a nutshell, parents are solely responsible for kid’s acts. I advocate that it is necessary to make it legal.
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 70
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 79
- It is a foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down. To what extent do you agree to disagree? 77
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 84
- Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy; some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree, what are the advantages or disadvantages associated with this. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unacceptable manner" with adverb for "unacceptable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
Often, kids behave in an unacceptable manner. Sometimes in a way, that is not taught...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing and by the teaching of the parents. To begin with, it is said that, 'c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an abusive way" with adverb for "abusive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rving his parents. So, if parents speak in an abusive way, it is most likely that child will obse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally liable their children's acts. These analysis prove that kids act in a ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this analysis' or 'These analyses'?
Suggestion: This analysis; These analyses
...iable their children's acts. These analysis prove that kids act in a way they are b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 20.9802955665 186% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14459984601 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557971014493 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.6157635468 238% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5818970926 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2352941176 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182071918062 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738868392542 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643096231117 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129667722634 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103901268548 0.0609392437508 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.