Recently, the phenomenon of parents' influence on children's behaviour and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many the matter of parents' responsibility toward children is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that parents play a significant role in their child's behaviour and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, role-model parents can provide a society with some noticeable impacts which are rooted in the fact that disciplined children as well as responsible ones, inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic examination which discovered friendly family bringing up successful and respectful children. Thus, the beneficial consequences of being friendly and responsible apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of nurturing, breakdown families might increase the consequences of juvenile delinquencies. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of poor upbringing related to this reality that the demerits of committing a crime pertain to irresponsible parents. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of criminals and violence is correlated negatively with breakdown families. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived the notion of the parents' impacts.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of responsible parents far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of successful children prove the significance of having role-model parents, but also pinpoint reducing criminals implication.
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities? 61
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 55
- Many people believe that they should spend their money to enjoy life at present. Others, however, think that they should save it for the future. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places 87
- Crime rate, in most countries, is often higher in urban areas than in rural areas. Why do you think that is? What can be done to reduce the crime rate? 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94252873563 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35268964925 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659003831418 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8938327325 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197506356744 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637673374703 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470631286715 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111001897562 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613840445292 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.